In view of the global evaluation of the Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreements (SFPAs) that will be carried out by the Commission in 2021, the author highlights the key points which will need to be assessed from the perspective of the impacts on African coastal communities. The author also suggests essential improvements to be made for the future of SFPAs so that they better respond to the needs of these communities.
With Senegal’s yellow card, fisheries agreement negotiations between the EU and Senegal are at a standstill. Meanwhile, the EU will negotiate the renewal of its SFPA with The Gambia, whose waters are bordered on both sides by Senegal’s. How would access to the Gambian waters be used by EU fleets, at a time when they may be barred from Senegal waters?
At a time when the fisheries agreement is being renegotiated, Senegal is initiating a formal dialogue with the EU on the fight against IUU fishing. As part of this dialogue, the European Union has a responsibility to improve controls on vessels of European origin, and to impose heavy penalties when they fail to comply with the rules.
This article analyses a series of studies jointly commissioned by CAOPA and CFFA on areas reserved to artisanal fisheries in several African countries. The author sheds light on common challenges for protecting small-scale fishers access and the pressing need for better developing co-management in coastal fisheries, and looks into how can the EU support protection of small-scale fishers’ access to resources.
In a contribution sent to the European Commission, co-signed with 8 other civil society and environmental organisations, we highlight the most important points to be taken into account for the renewal of the protocol, to ensure that the fishing agreement has a positive impact for small-scale coastal fishing communities.
The European Commission has decided to assess the merits of concluding a Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement (SFPA) with the Republic of Angola. For a dialogue on sustainable fisheries in Angola, the EU will need to address the issue of total fishing effort and the framework within which joint ventures operate, as well as revising the presence of European-owned vessels with a bad track record.
For the agreement to contribute effectively to the Sustainable Development Goals, it is essential that the forthcoming negotiations, prior to the thirteenth ministerial conference, focus on the main threat to artisanal fisheries in Africa: overfishing and overcapacity, especially by foreign-owned vessels.
SOPERKA, a Senegalese fishing company, in a joint venture with the Spanish company Grupo Pereira, wished to react to our article “Experimental fishing or experimental pillaging in Liberia?” Mr Kandji, Managing Director, Mr Serrano, from the company Pereira, adviser to SOPERKA for its fishing operations, and Mr Perez Bouzada, a lawyer, who defends the interests of the company Pereira, expressed their views on a series of issues raised in the article.
Sponsored by the World Bank, as part of their Liberia Sustainable Management of Fisheries project worth 40 million euros, this research campaign will take advantage of the CRODT research vessel, the ITAF DEME, launched in 2021 with the EU-Senegal Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement (SFPA) sectoral support.
As a new round of negotiations between the EU and Mauritania is expected to start soon, this position paper recalls the demands of the Mauritanian artisanal fisheries sector, highlighting technical conditions, such as the access to octopus to be reserved for local artisanal fishers, the zoning for trawlers to be maintained, and landings of small pelagics to be kept. Governance issues are also key, such as transparency, especially regarding the activities of other foreign fleets; and the urgent need for the SFPA to contribute to regional management for shared stocks.
In this joint position, CAOPA and CFFA request that, in the framework of the future EU–Africa partnership, which focuses on sustainable investments and the promotion of good governance in fisheries, a set of principles be defined to ensure that fisheries joint ventures operate in a transparent manner, do not compete with local artisanal fisheries, and are in line with the objectives of sustainable fisheries development in the third country concerned.
The latest ODI report presents the scale of the Chinese flagged, owned and/or operated DWF fleet and highlights the gaps and challenges in China’s governance capacity, but the methodology and the figures need to be taken with a pinch of salt. Using specific examples, CFFA reviews the key findings and implications for the West Africa region.
The constitution of joint ventures in African fisheries is often based on very limited knowledge of ecosystems, the state of fish resources, or the dynamics of the fisheries sector and coastal communities.
This lack of information, instead of encouraging foreign investors and institutions to be cautious, has often resulted in irresponsible investment. There are countless cases in the history of Africa maritime fisheries, where overfishing due to overinvestment in production facilities ultimately led to a fall in fish resources, business closures and negative impacts for local coastal fisheries with which they competed for access to resources.
In West Africa, foreign private investors, - mainly from China, Korea, EU, Russia-, are often operating under joint ventures. In the last years, such joint ventures have been denounced for their opacity, and, more recently, some of them were denounced for being involved in systematic fraudulent practices, such as the massive under reporting of tonnage by vessels of Chinese origin operating under joint ventures in West Africa.
In the case of the EU, it is to be noted that, in sustainable fisheries partnership agreements signed between EU and African countries (SFPA), an article is now inserted, on ‘Promoting cooperation among economic operators and civil society’, which encourages the setting-up of joint ventures.
In a joint paper, CFFA and its partner CAOPA argue that the implementation of this article requires defining a set of principles to ensure such joint ventures operate in a transparent manner, do not enter in competition with the local artisanal sector, and are in line with the third country sustainable fisheries development objectives.
