Financialisation and the blue economy
A series on Conservation finance
Conservation finance has become dominant in the efforts to avert the climate crisis and reverse biodiversity loss. This rise of conservation finance is significant for marine fisheries as it is a central component of the “blue economy” concept. While the proponents present an ambitious vision, understanding the jargon is difficult. There is a pressing need for clarity over what the conservation finance industry is saying and doing.
Why the $700 billion funding gap is dangerous nonsense
The funding gap for biodiversity has been estimated at $700 billion in Goal D of the Kunming-Montreal Agreement. Taking examples from fisheries and ocean conservation, the author shows this figure is based on highly dubious calculations and assumptions.
Understanding the conservation finance industry
Financialisation is considered to be the fundamental dynamic that contributes to inequalities in the world, while also a threat to democracy because it transfers the ownership and control of so much to a small group of financial investors and institutions, with the only goal of maximising profits.
Seychelles: How blue bonds affect local fishing communities
Andre Standing, senior consultant at CFFA, discusses with researcher Arınç Onat Kılıç, who has recently published a paper exploring the Seychelles Blue Bond, its impact on local fishing communities and the broader implications of private finance for developing the blue economy.
Debt-for-nature swaps : The Belize Blue Bond
TNC agreed a debt-for-ocean swap in Belize. This is part of an “audacious plan” of other debt swaps in other countries. However, the swaps carry controversies: they reflect the trend of financialisation of conservation, and hence are worrying for those that depend on the oceans for their livelihoods.
The implications for ocean governance of Gabon debt swap
TNC’s agreed to a debt-for-ocean swap with Gabon, involving US$500 million worth of debt. In exchange, Gabon commits to protect 30% of the ocean. We explore the problems with this deal in terms of debt justice and of ocean governance, and develops its implications for coastal communities.
BEFI: How to destroy the oceans responsibly
The Blue Economy Finance Initiative has been celebrated in international conferences about blue economy, however, this article highlights the inherent weaknesses of voluntary guidelines in mitigating the threats financial investors pose to the destruction of the planet.
Closing the funding gap for biodiversity conservation is one of the critical topics at the 16th Conference of the Parties (COP 16) to the UN Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), hosted in Colombia in October 2024. The funding gap has been estimated at $700 billion in Goal D of the Kunming-Montreal Agreement, based on a report, “Financing Nature”, published in 2020. Taking the example of fisheries and ocean conservation, this article shows the $700 billion figure is based on highly dubious calculations and assumptions. The author argues the funding gap report is not a serious effort to estimate the needs for supporting conservation efforts. Instead, it is a performative publication marketing opportunities for private investment and market-based mechanisms. Therefore, the $700 billion figure should be rejected by those opposed to the continuing financialisation of conservation.